Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/17/1975
State v. Turner
Citations
- 538 P.2d 966
- 217 Kan. 574
- 87 A.L.R. 3d 337
- 1975 Kan. LEXIS 467
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- commingling of prosecution and adjudicative functions by the Kansas Board of Law Examiners does not deny due process in disciplinary proceeding
- The disciplinary administrator must clearly set out the facts in the complaint so that the respondent receives proper notice of the basic factual situation out of which the charges might result.
- rejecting a similar confrontation argument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fromme, Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado· 1996-02-12· cited 133×
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1980-05-10· cited 46×
- In Re BergSupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-03-06· cited 34×
- State v. CaenenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1984-04-27· cited 32×
- Mendicino v. WhitchurchWyoming Supreme Court· 1977-06-03· cited 28×
- Goldstein v. Commission on Practice of the Supreme CourtMontana Supreme Court· 2000-01-13· cited 26×
- Matter of RonwinArizona Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 26×
- In Re FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1987-12-11· cited 22×
- State v. MerskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-10-14· cited 22×
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-10-23· cited 19×
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas· 1982-02-05· cited 18×
- State v. RomeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1984-06-08· cited 15×
- In re RonwinArizona Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 15×
- State v. CallahanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1982-10-22· cited 11×
- Matter of Discipline of RussellSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-04-20· cited 8×
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. George P. Stanton, IIIWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2014-06-05· cited 8×
- In Re CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-11-05· cited 6×
- Hart v. Kansas Board of Healing ArtsCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-03-17· cited 6×
- In Re MillettSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-10-15· cited 5×
- In Re DaughertySupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-01-30· cited 5×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court· 1975-04-16· cited 2,322×
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 994×
- Tri-State Hotel Co. v. LonderholmSupreme Court of Kansas· 1965-12-11· cited 82×
- Smith v. Blakey, AdministratorSupreme Court of Kansas· 1973-11-03· cited 51×
- In re the Disbarment of BurnetteSupreme Court of Kansas· 1906-05-12· cited 49×
- Board of County Commissioners v. BrookoverSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-01-21· cited 43×
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. BrandonSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1969-02-18· cited 42×
- People ex rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. AmosIllinois Supreme Court· 1910-10-28· cited 33×
- Bar Ass'n v. CockrellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-01-08· cited 26×
- In Re the Accusation for Disbarment of RatnerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1965-03-06· cited 25×
- State v. AlveySupreme Court of Kansas· 1974-07-17· cited 24×
- Morra v. State Board of Examiners of PsychologistsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1973-05-12· cited 21×
- In Re the Accusation for Disbarment of PhelpsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1969-09-24· cited 17×
- In re Disbarment of GorsuchSupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-04-07· cited 16×
- In re Disbarment of MacySupreme Court of Kansas· 1921-04-09· cited 14×
- Forsyth v. ChurchSupreme Court of Kansas· 1935-04-06· cited 12×
- In Re NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1969-02-03· cited 11×
- State v. MartindaleSupreme Court of Kansas· 1974-11-02· cited 8×
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1970-11-07· cited 8×
- Kentucky State Bar Association v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1972-06-30· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.