People v. Varallo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an attorney’s knowing use of client funds for his personal benefit constituted a knowing misappropriation of those funds and violated Colo. RPC 8.4(c)
• deciding to make the effective date of disbarment the date of the lawyer’s immediate suspension when there were three years between the immediate suspension and order of disbarment
• noting that \[n]o member of the hearing board or hearing panel can exercise investigative or prosecutorial functions because of the separation between the inquiry panel and hearing panel\
• noting that “[n]o member of the hearing board or hearing panel can exercise investigative or prosecutorial functions because of the separation between the inquiry panel and hearing panel”
• noting that \[n]o member of the hearing board or hearing panel can exercise investigative or prosecutorial functions because of the separation between the inquiry panel and hearing panel\
• indicating that knowing conversion calls for disbarment, absent significant mitigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).