Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/8/1984

State v. Rome

Citations

685 P.2d 290
235 Kan. 642
1984 Kan. LEXIS 370

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

determining that supreme court must sit even though it is interpreting its own authority
“[Disqualification must yield to necessity if recusal would thwart the only tribunal where relief [is] available.”
court rejected motion to disqualify justices of supreme court under Code of Judicial Conduct where motion was based on justices’ prior involvement in litigant’s removal from judicial office
in disciplinary proceedings, supreme court justices were not required to disqualify themselves under Code of Judicial Conduct because the court was involved in litigant’s removal from judicial office
in disciplinary proceedings, supreme court justices were not required to disqualify themselves under Code of Judicial Conduct because the court was involved in litigant's removal from judicial office
decided under analogous provisions of federal law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.