State v. Tucker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statutes do not apply retroactively “if doing so will impair existing rights, create new obligations or impose additional duties with respect to past acts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Tucker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-11-13· cited 10×
• State v. Bernson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-09-14· cited 9×
• Antonacci v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-09-11· cited 3×
• State v. Tucker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-02-14· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Whipple v. Howser
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-08-11· cited 139×
• Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-03-21· cited 105×
• Joseph v. Lowery
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1972-04-04· cited 104×
• Perkins v. Willamette Industries, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-11-20· cited 32×
• State v. Pottle
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-01-24· cited 32×
• State v. Tucker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-04-13· cited 11×
• Holmes v. State Accident Insurance Fund
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-01-29· cited 10×
• State v. Tucker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-07-22· cited 8×
• State v. Tucker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-02-02· cited 2×