State v. Tucker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• police disregard of minimization provision in state statute required suppression of all intercepted communications
• police disregard of minimization provision in state statute required suppression of all intercepted communications

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pottle
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-01-24· cited 32×
• State v. Tucker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-11-13· cited 10×
• State v. Tucker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-04-20· cited 8×
• State v. Tucker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-07-22· cited 8×
• State v. Capell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-10-28· cited 6×
• State v. Lissy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-05-27· cited 5×
• State v. Pottle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-04-13· cited 5×
• State v. Tucker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-02-14· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Alderman v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 2,470×
• Scott v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 1,598×
• United States v. Focarile
  D. Maryland· 1972-02-22· cited 103×
• United States v. LaGorga
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1971-12-28· cited 82×
• United States v. Leta
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1971-10-11· cited 56×
• United States v. Lanza
  M.D. Florida· 1972-10-10· cited 20×
• State v. Pottle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-04-13· cited 5×