Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a particular obligation is implied-in-law because, “under all the circumstances of the parties’ relationship, * * * defendant would be unjustly enriched” if the promise were not implied
• holding that a particular obligation is implied-in-law because, ‘under all the circumstances of the parties’ relationship, * * * defendant would be unjustly enriched’ if the promise were not implied
• addressing preemption first because resolution of that issue might “obviate all other problems, depending upon how it is decided”
• focusing on whether a “substantial number” of the class members lacked the required characteristic
• applying state common-law restitutionary principles to loan-related activities of federal lenders
• applying state common-law restitutionary principles to loan-related activities of federal lenders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).