State v. Calleia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a trial court should not have to guess which issues are being raised and that a Rule 1925(b
• recognizing the Y-STR DNA analysis is \relevant\ and \probative\ in demonstrating a suspect cannot be excluded from a \class of individuals who could have 'contributed' . . . biological material\
• noting general guidance that “declaration of the victim’s state of mind ... should not be used to prove the defendant’s motivation or conduct” (quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).