Skip to main content

State v. Harris

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 5807

Syllabus

Motion to suppress; search and seizure; Fourth Amendment; probable cause; conceded error; consecutive sentences; findings; R.C. 2929.14(C)(4); allied offenses. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. The trial court did not err by denying the motion to suppress based on the fact that the defendant failed to demonstrate that the evidence demonstrating probable cause from the sequence of events and observations presented in the affidavit supporting the search warrant was insufficient. Nevertheless, the sentences imposed on two of the drug-related counts are contrary to law based on the State's concession that those two offenses should have merged. And finally, the consecutive sentences on all counts are reversed based on the lack of findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4).

Judges: S. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.