Skip to main content

State v. Lewis

Citations

  • 243 P.3d 70
  • 349 Or. 172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \preservation was not required\ when the error appeared for the first time on the face of the judgment
  • holding that preservation was not required where the matters claimed as error on appeal were not announced in open court but appeared for the first time in the judgment
  • holding \preservation was not required\ when the challenged portions of the defendant's sentence were not announced in open court, but instead simply appeared on the face of the judgment
  • applying that principle where error appeared for the first time in the judgment
  • preservation not required where the objected to portions of the sentence were not announced in open court, but appeared in the judgment
  • preservation not required where aspects of sentence assigned as error on appeal were not announced in open court but simply appeared in the judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.