State v. Macy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] defendant is not required to preserve a challenge to a portion of a sentence that appeared for the first time in a judgment because the defendant had no opportunity to preserve the challenge at a hearing where that sentence was never announced.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Priester
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-04-26· cited 107×
• State v. Barr
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-02-28· cited 70×
• State v. Bates
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-27· cited 13×
• State v. Pine
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-02-26· cited 3×
• State v. Manigo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-06· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Tison
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-06-13· cited 34×
• State v. Baccaro
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-16· cited 18×
• State v. Nguyen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-06-12· cited 8×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-19· cited 8×
• State v. Nilsen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-12-22· cited 1×