Skip to main content

State v. Thomson

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 600

Syllabus

Following a jury trial, appellant was convicted of improperly handling a firearm in a motor vehicle and receiving stolen property (with a firearm specification). Counsel did not provide ineffective assistance of counsel. Two police officers did not provide expert testimony thus, the State had no obligation to provide expert reports under Crim.R. 16(K). Finally, the trial court made the consecutive sentence findings required by R.C. 2929.14(C)(4), and it cannot be concluded by clear and convincing evidence that the record did not support these findings. Judgment affirmed. (Froelich, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.)

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.