Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/30/2020
State v. Deaton
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 6955
Syllabus
Competent, credible evidence supported the trial court's judgment overruling appellant's petition for post-conviction relief. Therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling appellant's petition. Judgment affirmed. (Hall, J., concurring.)
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court· 2000-01-05· cited 1,280×
- State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 940×
- State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-26· cited 691×
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court· 1992-12-18· cited 551×
- State v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court· 1987-10-07· cited 525×
- State v. DarmondOhio Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 392×
- State v. NicholasOhio Supreme Court· 1993-06-16· cited 256×
- State v. FieldsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-03· cited 60×
- Fifth Third Mtge. Co. v. SalahuddinOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-07-29· cited 12×
- State v. HerronOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-16· cited 9×
- State v. CooperOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-27· cited 7×
- State v. GreathouseOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-12· cited 5×
- State v. DeatonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-31· cited 5×
- State v. DeatonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-04· cited 3×
- Eldridge v. EldridgeOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-25· cited 3×
- State v. ThomsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-21· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.