Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/16/2021

State v. Thompson

Citations

2021 Ohio 1344

Syllabus

Judgment affirmed where statements directing police were not impermissible hearsay, additional statements not prejudicial, and there was no evidence of record to support an inference of gang activity permitting mention in closing argument by defense counsel.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Thompson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-15· cited 6×
State v. Bonner
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-03· cited 5×
State ex rel. Thompson v. Gonzalez
Ohio Supreme Court· 2024-03-14· cited 5×
State v. Walker
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-16

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Crawford v. Washington
Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
Blakemore v. Blakemore
Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
State v. Maurer
Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-12-20· cited 1,623×
State v. Loza
Ohio Supreme Court· 1994-11-30· cited 824×
State v. Brown
Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-08-31· cited 695×
State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-09-13· cited 457×
State v. Beasley
Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 310×
State v. Wallace
Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-06-08· cited 175×
State v. Osie (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-10· cited 155×
State v. Ricks
Ohio Supreme Court· 2013-09-05· cited 102×
State v. Powell
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2008-08-11· cited 26×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.