Supreme Court of Vermont· 6/3/1994
State v. Thompson
Citations
- 650 A.2d 139
- 162 Vt. 532
- 1994 Vt. LEXIS 104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- absent plain error, claim of error under Rule 11(c) demands factual record and opportunity for trial court to grant relief before it may be reviewed in Supreme Court
- we will not overturn findings of trial court if supported by credible evidence and not clearly erroneous
- direct appeal, plain error required
- direct appeal, plain error required
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re J.M.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2001-02-09· cited 43×
- State v. ClearySupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-02-07· cited 35×
- State v. BeanSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-10-20· cited 34×
- State v. FletcherSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-04-01· cited 24×
- In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-06-06· cited 23×
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-09-01· cited 19×
- In re HemingwaySupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-05-02· cited 15×
- State v. PollardSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-01-20· cited 13×
- State v. MarkuSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-03-30· cited 13×
- State v. PloofSupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-09-16· cited 12×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-01-16· cited 11×
- State v. BenwareSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-10-14· cited 3×
- In Re JMSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-02-09
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.