Skip to main content

In re J.M.

Citations

  • 172 Vt. 61
  • 769 A.2d 656
  • 2001 Vt. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, “in juvenile competency hearings, evaluations of a particular juvenile’s competency are to be made with regard to juvenile norms”
  • holding conclusory statement not “adequate to explain how the court weighed the evidence and reached the conclusion it did”
  • finding plain error where family court accepted juvenile’s conditional plea without Rule 11 colloquy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Johnson, Morse, Skoglund

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.