Supreme Court of Vermont· 1/16/1998
State v. Thompson
Citations
- 708 A.2d 192
- 167 Vt. 383
- 1998 Vt. LEXIS 2
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that failure to comply with requirements of Rule 11(c) to ensure that defendant fully understood nature of charges and consequences of plea “undermines confidence in the outcome of the proceedings and thus was plain error” requiring that plea be vacated
- holding that failure to comply with requirements of Rule 11(c) to ensure that defendant fully understood nature of charges and consequences of plea “undermines confidence in the outcome of the proceedings and thus was plain error” requiring that plea be vacated
- direct appeal; plain error found
- direct appeal; plain error found
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amestoy, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re J.M.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2001-02-09· cited 43×
- State v. ClearySupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-02-07· cited 35×
- State v. BeaudoinSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-11-21· cited 17×
- In Re ParksSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-05-09· cited 15×
- In re HemingwaySupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-05-02· cited 15×
- In Re JMSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-02-09
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.