Supreme Court of Vermont· 9/16/1994
State v. Ploof
Citations
- 649 A.2d 774
- 162 Vt. 560
- 1994 Vt. LEXIS 100
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant’s alleged suicidal conduct was fairly and thoroughly considered by the court, which found it unconvincing
- no plain error found where clear and adequate information about nature of offense was placed on record in presence of defendant
- direct appeal, plain error required
- direct appeal, plain error required
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ClearySupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-02-07· cited 35×
- In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-06-06· cited 23×
- State v. MerchantSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-12-21· cited 19×
- In re ManoshSupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-08-14· cited 15×
- In Re HemingwaySupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-06-05· cited 12×
- State v. Ernest PhillipsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2018-08-10· cited 4×
- State v. CurrierSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-08-25· cited 1×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Donald Gene Boag v. Robert RainesNinth Circuit· 1985-08-26· cited 125×
- In Re HallSupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-11-01· cited 39×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-06-03· cited 21×
- In Re KivelaSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-03-22· cited 20×
- In Re HansonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-02-26· cited 16×
- People v. HolmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1983-05-24· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.