Skip to main content

State v. Thompson

Citations

  • 558 P.2d 1079
  • 221 Kan. 165
  • 1976 Kan. LEXIS 578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that intent to permanently deprive not element of robbery and that general intent will suffice for robbery conviction
  • holding that intent to permanently deprive not element of robbery and that general intent will suffice for robbery conviction
  • holding that unconstitutional government action can only be challenged by a person directly affected; it cannot be challenged by one invoicing the rights of third parties
  • holding defendant who was charged with forcible sodomy did not have standing to challenge the sodomy statute as unconstitutionally vague against consensual homosexual acts
  • rejecting defendant’s claim that the sodomy statute was unconstitutional because the defendant, who was charged with forcible sodomy, did not have standing to argue that statute discriminated against consensual homosexual acts
  • analyzing constitutionality of former sodomy statute; holding defendant lacked standing to challenge sodomy statute on ground that it unconstitutionally prohibited private, consensual acts of adults when defendant was convicted of forcible sodomy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.