State v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellate court concluded trial court had abused its discretion in admitting, as excited utterances, statements made by two young children
• appellate court concluded trial court had abused its discretion in admitting, as excited utterances, statements made by two young children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bass
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2000-11-09· cited 586×
• State v. Lopez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-01-22· cited 80×
• Felix v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-03-18· cited 47×
• State v. Mickelson
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1992-12-31· cited 14×
• State v. Hernandez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-05-26· cited 13×
• State v. Ruelas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-10-27· cited 11×
• Pueblo v. Sierra Figueroa
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2002-06-28· cited 2×
• State of Arizona v. Daniel Aaron Lopez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-01-22
• State of Arizona v. Justin Alexander Copeland
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2022-04-01
• El Pueblo De P.R. v. Abraham Sierra Figueroa
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2002-06-28

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Robinson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-04-07· cited 253×
• City of Phoenix v. Geyler
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 203×
• State v. Rivera
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-02-16· cited 51×
• State v. Ritchey
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-11-11· cited 43×
• State v. Martin
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-11· cited 36×
• State v. Tucker
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-03-28· cited 32×
• May v. Wright
  Washington Supreme Court· 1963-05-02· cited 27×
• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-03-05· cited 10×