Skip to main content

State v. Martin

Citations

  • 663 P.2d 236
  • 135 Ariz. 552
  • 1983 Ariz. LEXIS 175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming in part and modifying in part State v. Martin, 135 Ariz. 556, 663 P.2d 240 (App.1982)
  • finding it problematic that the “trial court, in admitting the prior consistent statements, made no determination as to when the motive to fabricate began”
  • stating that under Arizona's rule 801(d)(1)(B
  • stating that under Arizona’s rule 801(d)(1)(B
  • a “parade of corroborating witnesses” repeating inadmissible hearsay bolstering a victim’s credibility may be prejudicial
  • a “parade of corroborating witnesses” repeating inadmissible hearsay bolstering a victim’s credibility may be prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cameron, Gordon, Holohan, Hays, Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.