State v. Vanwey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A nunc pro tunc order under K.S.A. 22-3504[2] may only be used to correct actual clerical errors or errors arising from oversight or omission.”
• in addition to lack of jurisdiction to modify sentence, trial court’s modification of consecutive sentences to run concurrently was clearly contrary to statute requiring consecutive sentences
• “Nor does agreement of the parties and the presentation of an agreed order to the trial court [to change statutorily mandated consecutive sentence to concurrent] bring life into an otherwise invalid action.”
• court expressly rejecting this argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).