Skip to main content

State v. Thomas

Citations

  • 203 S.E.2d 445
  • 157 W. Va. 640
  • 1974 W. Va. LEXIS 208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[s]uch evidence will be considered strictly upon the ground of its relevancy to the purpose for which it is sought to be introduced”
  • \Errors involving deprivation of constitutional rights will be regarded as harmless only if there is not reasonable possibility that the violation contributed to the conviction.\
  • “Errors involving deprivation of constitutional rights will be regarded as harmless only if there is no reasonable possibility, that the violation contributed to the conviction.”
  • “Errors involving deprivation of constitutional rights will be regarded as harmless only if there is no reasonable possibility that the violation contributed to the conviction.”
  • “Errors involving deprivation of constitutional rights will be regarded as harmless only if there is no reasonable possibility that the violation contributed to the conviction.”
  • “Our court has held that ineffective assistance of counsel, if proven, can be grounds for coram nobis relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

330 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.