Court of Appeals of Washington· 5/22/1998
State v. Thomas
Citations
- 955 P.2d 420
- 91 Wash. App. 195
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a seizure occurred when officer took defendant's identification with him to perform a warrants check
- concluding that when officer took license of defendant sitting in parked car to the rear of the car to conduct a warrants check, \a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment . . . occurred\
- stating that “[o]nce an officer retains the suspect’s identification or driver’s license and takes it with him to conduct a warrants check, a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment has occurred”
- stating that ”[o]nce an officer retains the suspect’s identification or driver’s license and takes it with him to conduct a warrants check, a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment has occurred”
- officer seized suspect when he stepped back three steps to the rear of the suspect's car while holding suspect's identification in order to use hand-held radio for a warrants check
- untainted eyewitness testimony and physical evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bridgewater
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DanielTennessee Supreme Court· 2000-01-31· cited 408×
- State v. LuiWashington Supreme Court· 2014-01-02· cited 92×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-06-22· cited 65×
- Golphin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-12-14· cited 58×
- People v. JacksonSupreme Court of Colorado· 2002-01-28· cited 45×
- State v. WestoverOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-08· cited 25×
- State v. Del McReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-11-28· cited 18×
- State v. McReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-01-30· cited 17×
- State v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-03-16· cited 17×
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-12-29· cited 17×
- State v. CoyneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-01-25· cited 16×
- State v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-03-02· cited 14×
- State v. CoyneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-03-09· cited 14×
- Ramsey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-08-15· cited 13×
- State v. DixonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-03-20· cited 12×
- State v. BeitoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-11-18· cited 11×
- State v. CerrilloCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-10-03· cited 5×
- State v. CerrilloCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-11-21· cited 4×
- State v. RUEMCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-06-01· cited 1×
- State v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-03-30
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court· 1995-11-29· cited 1,729×
- Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 1,569×
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 1,151×
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court· 1994-03-17· cited 742×
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court· 1985-09-05· cited 721×
- State v. StroudWashington Supreme Court· 1986-06-12· cited 292×
- United States v. Donald Lee KappermanEleventh Circuit· 1985-07-01· cited 121×
- State v. ThornWashington Supreme Court· 1996-05-30· cited 117×
- State v. MennegarWashington Supreme Court· 1990-03-15· cited 85×
- State v. ArangurenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-12-30· cited 54×
- State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-03-17· cited 38×
- State v. BelangerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-03-05· cited 27×
- State v. DudasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-12-12· cited 20×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-01-16· cited 18×
- State v. SeitzCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-07-18· cited 17×
- State v. HunnelCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-01-23· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.