Skip to main content

State v. Young

Citations

  • 161 P.3d 967

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining a subsequent recantation does not render an excited utterance inadmissible without definitive evidence that establishes the initial statement was fabricated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mary E. Fairhurst

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.