Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/21/2019

State v. Cotto

Citations

2019 Ohio 985

Syllabus

Mandatory fine R.C. 2929.18(B) R.C. 2929.19 drug trafficking indigent motion to waive. The imposition of a mandatory fine was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law where the court considered the defendant's future ability to pay the fine and concluded that the defendant was not indigent and unable to pay the fine.

Judges: Headen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Debose
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-17· cited 15×
State v. Mosby
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-31· cited 13×
State v. Jefferson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-05· cited 3×
State v. Patterson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-08· cited 1×
State v. Howard
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-21· cited 1×
State v. Nowden
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-16· cited 1×
State v. Harris
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-09-18· cited 1×
State v. St. Valle
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-28
State v. Murray
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-18
State v. Terrell
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-26

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Gipson
Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-01-07· cited 186×
State v. Schneider
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-19· cited 17×
State v. Ficklin
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-11· cited 11×
State v. Simpson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-16· cited 11×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.