Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/1/2018
State v. Smith
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4421
Syllabus
Abuse of discretion, indigent, mandatory fine, R.C. 2925.03(D)(1). The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it determined that the appellant was not indigent. The trial court considered the appellant's present ability to pay the mandatory fine, in accordance with R.C. 2925.03(D)(1), and assessed that the appellant was in good financial standing.
Judges: Laster Mays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. GipsonOhio Supreme Court· 1998-01-07· cited 186×
- State v. SchneiderOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-19· cited 17×
- State v. LedbetterOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-12· cited 9×
- State v. CruzOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-24· cited 9×
- State v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-20· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.