Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 4421

Syllabus

Abuse of discretion, indigent, mandatory fine, R.C. 2925.03(D)(1). The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it determined that the appellant was not indigent. The trial court considered the appellant's present ability to pay the mandatory fine, in accordance with R.C. 2925.03(D)(1), and assessed that the appellant was in good financial standing.

Judges: Laster Mays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.