Skip to main content

State v. Telford

Citations

  • 940 P.2d 522
  • 320 Utah Adv. Rep. 27
  • 1997 Utah App. LEXIS 72
  • 1997 WL 348840

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that jail’s policy of inspecting and scanning outgoing mail is narrowly tailored and served important government interests by promoting discipline and preventing criminal acts
  • concluding that the trial court erred by failing to sever the trial for defendants because “the defenses were mutually exclusive,” that is, “the jury had to reject one defense to believe the other”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins, Bench, Orme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.