United States v. Charles Whalen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because defendant, pursuant to prison regulations, left his outgoing letters unsealed, he had no expectation of privacy with respect to their contents
• “[I]t is well established that prisons have sound reasons for reading the outgoing mail of their inmates.”
• “[I]t is well established that prisons have sound reasons for reading the outgoing mail of their inmates.”
• “it is well established that prisons have sound reasons for reading the outgoing mail of their inmates”
• “[I]t is well established that prisons have sound reasons for reading the outgoing mail of their inmates.”
• “[I]t is well established that prisons have sound reasons for reading the outgoing mail of their inmates”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).