Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/8/2019
State v. Teitelbaum
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3175
Syllabus
Trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over appellant's untimely and successive postconviction petition where R.C. 2953.23(A) exceptions did not apply. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Sadler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Shine-JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-30· cited 5×
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-05· cited 4×
- State v. L.A.A.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-25· cited 2×
- State v. BellOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-09· cited 2×
- State v. ShabazzOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-19· cited 1×
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-21
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2018-06-22· cited 1,201×
- State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court· 1994-09-28· cited 454×
- State v. SchleeOhio Supreme Court· 2008-02-20· cited 247×
- State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-11-29· cited 208×
- Ali v. StateOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-15· cited 114×
- State v. TeitelbaumOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-21· cited 32×
- State v. ConwayOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-06· cited 15×
- Chilcote v. KugelmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-09· cited 10×
- State v. LynchOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-20· cited 10×
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-30· cited 7×
- State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-08· cited 4×
- State v. DavenportOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-27· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.