Skip to main content

State v. Bell

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 1397

Syllabus

Trial court judgment entry denying appellant's motion to vacate and set aside judgment is affirmed. The motion was untimely, the arguments raised therein were barred by res judicata, and appellant did not meet the criteria to establish an exception to the timeliness requirement in R.C. 2953.23(A). Appellant's assignments of error are overruled.

Judges: Dorrian, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.