Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/21/2021
State v. Taylor
Citations
- 174 N.E.3d 1
- 2021 Ohio 1745
Syllabus
Carpenter v. United States, __ U.S. __, 138 S.Ct. 2206, 201 L.Ed.2d 507 (2018) was not retroactively applicable to appellant's case, as asserted in his petition for postconviction relief. Thus, the trial court correctly concluded that it was without jurisdiction to consider appellant's untimely petition. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2018-06-22· cited 1,201×
- Saffle v. ParksSupreme Court· 1990-03-05· cited 1,054×
- Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-02-20· cited 962×
- Tyler v. CainSupreme Court· 2001-06-28· cited 822×
- Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court· 2007-02-28· cited 725×
- State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-11-29· cited 208×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-30· cited 34×
- State v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-13· cited 28×
- State v. DavisonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-12· cited 18×
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-13· cited 9×
- State v. TeitelbaumOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-08· cited 7×
- State v. NeilOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-19· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.