State v. Taylor

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 142

Syllabus

Taylor was convicted of domestic violence, and his argument that R.C. 2919.25 is \unconstitutionally overbroad\ fails. With respect to the victim's 9-1-1 recording and her recorded conversations with Taylor while he was in jail, plain error is not demonstrated in defense counsel's failure to object or in the trial court's admission of this evidence. Plain error also is not demonstrated in the jury instructions regarding or the prosecutor's remarks in closing argument about consciousness of guilt. Taylor was not denied the right to confront his accuser. Taylor's convictions for aggravated burglary, carrying a concealed weapon, domestic violence, aggravated menacing, and domestic violence were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Taylor's handgun was subject to forfeiture. Taylor's right to a speedy trial was not violated. Judgment affirmed.