Skip to main content

State v. Taylor

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 8327

Syllabus

The trial court did not plainly err in permitting the state to ask a defense witness about her criminal conviction stemming from the same incident, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting the scope of redirect examination, the trial court did not err in denying Taylor's Crim.R. 29 motion for acquittal, and the manifest weight of the evidence supports Taylor's conviction.

Judges: Luper Schuster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.