Skip to main content

State v. Wood

Citations

  • 160 N.E.3d 439
  • 2020 Ohio 4895

Syllabus

Defendant's convictions for felonious assault, discharge of a firearm on or near prohibited premises, and carrying a concealed weapon were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Jury, as trier of fact, was able to observe witnesses as they testified and assess their credibility. Jury confusion, demonstrated solely through questions posed during deliberations, does not render a conviction against the manifest weight of the evidence. Trial court's finding that imposition of a third 3-year firearm was mandatory was contrary to R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(g).

Judges: Klatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.