Utah Supreme Court· 10/24/1997
State v. Taylor
Citations
- 947 P.2d 681
- 328 Utah Adv. Rep. 23
- 1997 Utah LEXIS 96
- 1997 WL 659777
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a rule 23B court‘s finding wasn‘t clearly erroneous because ―enough evidence‖ supported the court‘s finding even though the court could have found the opposite but didn‘t
- holding that counsel need not introduce potential mitigating evidence if counsel \believes after a thorough investigation that it will harm the case or if other strategic reasons for its omission exist\
- identifying the issue on rule 23B remand as whether counsel had \provided ineffective assistance of counsel and in doing so prejudiced the outcome\
- “Failure to investigate mitigating factors can constitute ineffective assistance of counsel only where such factors actually exist and may be productively used in the penalty phase.”
- two counts of first degree murder
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham, Stewart, Zimmerman, Howe, Russon, Durham'S
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court· 2000-09-29· cited 207×
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court· 2012-07-27· cited 176×
- Archuleta v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court· 2011-11-22· cited 116×
- State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court· 2001-02-23· cited 89×
- State v. ArguellesUtah Supreme Court· 2003-01-14· cited 68×
- State v. GriffinUtah Supreme Court· 2015-01-30· cited 58×
- Menzies v. StateUtah Supreme Court· 2014-09-23· cited 55×
- State v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court· 2015-07-31· cited 53×
- Lafferty v. StateUtah Supreme Court· 2007-09-14· cited 51×
- State v. GriffinUtah Supreme Court· 2016-07-27· cited 43×
- State v. LovellUtah Supreme Court· 1999-04-23· cited 42×
- Taylor v. StateUtah Supreme Court· 2012-01-24· cited 30×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2023-08-03· cited 23×
- State v. BrandleyCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1998-12-17· cited 18×
- State v. KooymanCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2005-05-19· cited 15×
- State v. DrommondUtah Supreme Court· 2020-07-17· cited 12×
- State v. EdgarCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2017-03-23· cited 7×
- State v. CheekCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2015-10-29· cited 6×
- Cramer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2006-12-07· cited 4×
- State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2012-11-29· cited 3×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,389×
- State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court· 1987-08-25· cited 237×
- Joseph James Blake v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic CenterEleventh Circuit· 1985-05-13· cited 191×
- Terry Allen Bouchillon v. James A. Collins, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionFifth Circuit· 1990-08-07· cited 181×
- State v. TemplinUtah Supreme Court· 1990-12-07· cited 158×
- Melvin Meffery Wade v. Arthur Calderon, Warden of San Quentin Attorney General of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1994-05-16· cited 125×
- United States v. Charles HammondsD.C. Circuit· 1970-03-30· cited 80×
- State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1990-03-26· cited 78×
- United States v. Larry L. HortonSeventh Circuit· 1988-04-26· cited 73×
- State v. WoodUtah Supreme Court· 1981-09-21· cited 62×
- Blake v. ZantS.D. Georgia· 1981-04-29· cited 47×
- United States v. Angelica AcevedoSeventh Circuit· 1989-08-14· cited 42×
- Taylor v. WardenUtah Supreme Court· 1995-10-20· cited 27×
- State v. HollandUtah Supreme Court· 1994-01-13· cited 23×
- Sivers v. R & F CAPITAL CORP.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-01· cited 13×
- Webb v. Van Der VeurCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1993-05-18· cited 5×
- State v. HugginsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1996-07-05· cited 4×
- Charles W. Webb v. Fred Van Der VeurTenth Circuit· 1995-09-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.