Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 10/24/1997

State v. Taylor

Citations

  • 947 P.2d 681
  • 328 Utah Adv. Rep. 23
  • 1997 Utah LEXIS 96
  • 1997 WL 659777

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a rule 23B court‘s finding wasn‘t clearly erroneous because ―enough evidence‖ supported the court‘s finding even though the court could have found the opposite but didn‘t
  • holding that counsel need not introduce potential mitigating evidence if counsel \believes after a thorough investigation that it will harm the case or if other strategic reasons for its omission exist\
  • identifying the issue on rule 23B remand as whether counsel had \provided ineffective assistance of counsel and in doing so prejudiced the outcome\
  • “Failure to investigate mitigating factors can constitute ineffective assistance of counsel only where such factors actually exist and may be productively used in the penalty phase.”
  • two counts of first degree murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Stewart, Zimmerman, Howe, Russon, Durham'S

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.