Skip to main content
· 3/30/1970

United States v. Charles Hammonds

Citations

  • 425 F.2d 597
  • 138 U.S. App. D.C. 166
  • 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10096

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • A pro forma defense does not meet the minimum requirements for effective assistance of counsel
  • ineffective summation denial of due process
  • ineffective summation denial of due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bazelon, Tamm, Jameson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.