Taylor v. Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where defendant did not introduce psychological report containing potentially mitigating evidence at effectiveness hearing, court cannot make judgments about its contents
• holding that where defendant did not introduce psychological report containing potentially mitigating evidence at effectiveness hearing, court cannot make judgments about its contents
• concluding counsel performed reasonably when deciding not to call the defendant’s father to testify because the “testimony would be more harmful than helpful” and the father “would not be very credible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).