State v. Tate
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2059
Syllabus
After conducting an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no issues with arguable merit for appeal. The record reflects that the trial court fully complied with the requirements of Crim.R. 11(E) and that appellant entered his guilty plea to unauthorized use of a motor vehicle knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily in Case No. 2021-CR-2172/1. Furthermore, appellant was afforded all of his due process protections before the trial court revoked his community control on unrelated felony counts in Case Nos. 2020-CR-2589 and 2020-CR-177 and sentenced him to an aggregate prison term of 18-months. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating a party waives error in the jury selection process unless the party objects before the jury was impaneled
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.