Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 12/20/1995

State v. Tate

Citations

925 S.W.2d 548
1995 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the only means of preserving the public confidence in the conduct of the trial therein was to require the appointment of an entirely new prosecution team
holding that a conflict of interest arises when a lawyer’s regard for the duty owed to one client tends to lead to disregard of the duty owed to another client
“Typically, the decision to disqualify a prosecutor or his office rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge.”
district attorney formerly served as judge presiding over defendant’s case
A part in the deliberative process may satisfy the “substantial relationship” prong.
district attorney formerly served as judge presiding over defendant’s case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wade, Tipton, Burch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.