Skip to main content

Frazier v. State

Citations

  • 303 S.W.3d 674
  • 2010 Tenn. LEXIS 88
  • 2010 WL 550841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that post-conviction petitioners enjoy the statutory 15 right to conflict free counsel, but not effective counsel
  • explaining that the obligations and responsibilities of statutorily appointed counsel are governed by the Tennessee Supreme Court rules, not the Constitution
  • explaining that the obligations and responsibilities of statutorily appointed counsel are governed by the Tennessee Supreme Court rules, not the Constitution
  • stating that there is not a constitutional right to counsel in state post-conviction proceedings but rather a statutory right to counsel
  • noting that an attorney in a post-conviction proceeding who had represented the petitioner on direct appeal had a clear conflict of interest
  • providing that a petitioner may knowingly and voluntarily waive the right to conflict-free counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wade, Holder, Clark, Koch, Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

173 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.