Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 11/15/1983

State v. Tanner

Citations

  • 675 P.2d 539
  • 1983 Utah LEXIS 1216

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that battered child syndrome evidence is admissible to prove non-accidental injuries when given by properly qualified expert witness
  • holding that evidence of specific instances of defendant's prior mistreatment of child vietim is relevant to establish specific pattern of behavior by defendant toward victim
  • holding that the inference need not eliminate all other possibilities that the crime may have been committed by another
  • holding that the inference need not eliminate all other possibilities that the crime may have been committed by another
  • holding that “evidence of specific instances of the defendant’s treatment of the child is relevant to establish . . . a specific pattern of behavior by the defendant toward one particular child”
  • holding that evidence of BCS, based on an examination of a child’s body rather than any prior conduct of defendant, is relevant to prove that the child’s injuries were not the result of an accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Stewart, Hall, Oaks, Howe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.