Supreme Court of Georgia· 5/13/1981
Smith v. State
Citations
- 277 S.E.2d 678
- 247 Ga. 612
- 18 A.L.R. 4th 1144
- 1981 Ga. LEXIS 781
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that expert testimony in support of a justification defense based on battered spouse syndrome would not be an improper opinion on an “ultimate fact”
- holding that expert testimony in support of a justification defense based on battered spouse syndrome would not he an improper opinion on an “ultimate fact”
- holding the trial court erred by not allowing the defendant’s expert to describe the phenomenon of “wife battering” and give an opinion about whether defendant’s personality and behavior corresponded to that of other battered women the expert had studied
- holding the trial court erred by not allowing the defendant's expert to describe the phenomenon of \wife battering\ and give an opinion about whether defendant's personality and behavior corresponded to that of other battered women the expert had studied
- justification predicated upon repeated acts of prior aggression committed against the defendant by the actual victim
- justification predicated upon repeated acts of prior aggression committed against the defendant by the actual victim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill, Jordan, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
157 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-07-24· cited 515×
- May v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-11-07· cited 475×
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 320×
- State v. KossOhio Supreme Court· 1990-03-07· cited 220×
- State v. AlleryWashington Supreme Court· 1984-05-17· cited 198×
- Ex Parte HaneySupreme Court of Alabama· 1992-06-19· cited 178×
- Timothy Duane Arcoren v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1991-06-05· cited 159×
- Chandler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1991-07-03· cited 147×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1989-03-16· cited 146×
- Fleming v. ZantSupreme Court of Georgia· 1989-12-01· cited 141×
- State v. CiskieWashington Supreme Court· 1988-03-17· cited 137×
- Allison v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1987-03-17· cited 123×
- State v. KellyWashington Supreme Court· 1984-06-28· cited 116×
- Jahnke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1984-06-06· cited 105×
- Ford Motor Co. v. StubblefieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-06-13· cited 93×
- Maxwell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1992-03-19· cited 89×
- State v. HennumSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-06-16· cited 83×
- Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1997-03-10· cited 82×
- Palmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-04-06· cited 78×
- United States v. Earl Foster BoiseNinth Circuit· 1990-09-27· cited 76×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ibn-Tamas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-10-15· cited 186×
- State v. GriffithsIdaho Supreme Court· 1980-04-03· cited 108×
- Lackey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1980-09-16· cited 80×
- State v. DozierWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1979-06-07· cited 56×
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1980-06-25· cited 54×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1974-09-18· cited 46×
- King v. BrowningSupreme Court of Georgia· 1980-06-17· cited 43×
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1980-12-03· cited 39×
- Mars v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1926-10-15· cited 30×
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-09-06· cited 21×
- Stamper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1975-09-16· cited 19×
- People v. PowellNew York County Courts· 1980-01-15· cited 14×
- Morrison v. BradleyColorado Court of Appeals· 1980-12-15· cited 7×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-10-31· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.