Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 277 S.E.2d 678
  • 247 Ga. 612
  • 18 A.L.R. 4th 1144
  • 1981 Ga. LEXIS 781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that expert testimony in support of a justification defense based on battered spouse syndrome would not be an improper opinion on an “ultimate fact”
  • holding that expert testimony in support of a justification defense based on battered spouse syndrome would not he an improper opinion on an “ultimate fact”
  • holding the trial court erred by not allowing the defendant’s expert to describe the phenomenon of “wife battering” and give an opinion about whether defendant’s personality and behavior corresponded to that of other battered women the expert had studied
  • holding the trial court erred by not allowing the defendant's expert to describe the phenomenon of \wife battering\ and give an opinion about whether defendant's personality and behavior corresponded to that of other battered women the expert had studied
  • justification predicated upon repeated acts of prior aggression committed against the defendant by the actual victim
  • justification predicated upon repeated acts of prior aggression committed against the defendant by the actual victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Jordan, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

157 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.