State v. Sweeney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• knowledge that possession was illegal is not an element
• government need not prove that defendant knew possession was illegal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Farnsworth
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-03-07· cited 26×
• State v. Minor
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-01-17· cited 24×
• State v. Breitung
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-04-20· cited 12×
• State v. Ibrahim
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-10-27· cited 6×
• State v. Esquivel
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-03-30· cited 4×
• Siperek v. United States
  W.D. Washington· 2017-08-29· cited 4×
• State Of Washington v. Joaquin David Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-04-03· cited 2×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-09-06· cited 113×
• State v. Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-02-07· cited 111×
• State v. Cruz
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-10-07· cited 85×
• State v. Schmidt
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-05-17· cited 61×
• State v. Reed
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-01-03· cited 42×
• State v. Leavitt
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-20· cited 32×
• State v. Krzeszowski
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-11· cited 23×
• State v. McKinley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-01-21· cited 20×
• State v. Dean
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-27· cited 16×
• State v. Cheatham
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-01-08· cited 13×
• Nelson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-12-29· cited 12×
• State v. Locati
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-18· cited 9×