Court of Appeals of Washington· 1/3/1997
State v. Reed
Citations
- 928 P.2d 469
- 84 Wash. App. 379
- 1997 WL 1665
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in prosecution for felon in possession of a firearm charge, defendant bears the initial burden of demonstrating constitutional error; once met, the State must prove validity beyond a reasonable doubt
- in prosecution for felon in possession of a firearm charge, defendant bears the initial burden of demonstrating constitutional error; once met, the State must prove validity beyond a reasonable doubt
- there is no requirement that the State prove the defendant knew his possession of a firearm was illegal or that he received notice of his ineligibility to possess a firearm
- “Under Staples ... a defendant must know of the characteristics that make a weapon illegal; the State, however, does not have to prove a defendant knows the law making his or her ownership of the weapon illegal.”
- unlawful 3 Under former RCW 46.61.502(6) (2008
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court· 2000-08-10· cited 116×
- State v. SnappCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-01-06· cited 34×
- State v. SemakulaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-11-10· cited 32×
- State v. WarfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-08-18· cited 29×
- State v. KrzeszowskiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-11· cited 23×
- State v. WarfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-12-09· cited 19×
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-17· cited 18×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-02-16· cited 15×
- State v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-01-04· cited 12×
- State v. BreitungCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-04-20· cited 12×
- State v. VanderpoolCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-03-16· cited 10×
- State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-03-08· cited 9×
- State v. LocatiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-18· cited 9×
- State v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-02-03· cited 9×
- State v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-09-24· cited 9×
- State v. SoperCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-09-19· cited 5×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-01-11· cited 5×
- State v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-03-09· cited 5×
- In Re RivardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-10-07· cited 4×
- State v. LambCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-09-13· cited 3×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 1,491×
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court· 1984-04-26· cited 316×
- State v. Shawn P.Washington Supreme Court· 1993-10-21· cited 120×
- United States v. Edward T. Smith, Jr.First Circuit· 1991-07-16· cited 100×
- State v. SwindellWashington Supreme Court· 1980-05-15· cited 64×
- American Network, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court· 1989-07-13· cited 39×
- United States v. Richard A. SchmittFifth Circuit· 1984-11-21· cited 38×
- State v. SummersWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-18· cited 31×
- Jerry Don Foster v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms and ParoleNinth Circuit· 1989-07-12· cited 30×
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-04-09· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.