Skip to main content

State v. Friend

Citations

  • 493 N.W.2d 540
  • 1992 Minn. LEXIS 316
  • 1992 WL 362282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the rape-shield law limits admission of evidence of the complainant’s prior sexual conduct
  • stating that “[i]n certain cases the due process clause, the right to confront accusers, or the right to present evidence will require [the] admission of evidence otherwise excluded by the rape shield law”
  • “In certain cases the due process clause, the right to confront accusers, or the right to present evidence will require admission of evidence otherwise excluded by the rape shield law.”
  • “In certain cases the due process clause, the right to confront accusers, or the right to present evidence will require admission of evidence otherwise excluded by the rape shield law.”
  • weighing probative value in light of other evidence
  • weighing probative value in light of other evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.