Court of Appeals of Washington· 4/2/2001
State v. Strauss
Citations
- 106 Wash. App. 1
- 20 P.3d 1022
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding admissibility of MnSost, RRASOR, and VRAG, actuarial instruments that demonstrate likelihood to reoffend; instruments generally accepted in relevant scientific community
- affirming lower court’s denial of a Frye hearing on the VRAG in sexual dangerousness case because “the relevant scientific community generally accepts” the instrument
- in which the Washington appellate court held that actuarial instruments were generally accepted within the relevant scientific community
- the relevant scientific community generally accepts the MnSOST and the VRAG and, therefore, a Frye hearing is unnecessary
- in which the Washington appellate court held that actuarial instruments were generally accepted within the relevant scientific community
- expert testified that Strauss suffered from paraphilia, not otherwise specified, rape
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Webster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Detention of ErbeAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-11-13· cited 42×
- In Re Detention of PostCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-07-14· cited 29×
- In re the Detention of PostCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-07-14· cited 28×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-01-07· cited 22×
- In Re Detention of DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-01-07· cited 21×
- In Re Detention of StraussCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-05-02· cited 19×
- In Re Detention of HoltzCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2002-09-25· cited 16×
- In Re Commitment of StevensAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-01-27· cited 16×
- In Re Detention of BoltonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-11-13· cited 15×
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-26· cited 14×
- In re the Detention of RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-11-06· cited 13×
- In Re Detention of RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-11-06· cited 11×
- Ortega-Mantilla v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-06· cited 6×
- United States v. MahoneyD. Massachusetts· 2014-10-14· cited 3×
- State v. HoltzCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2002-09-25· cited 1×
- In Re The Detention Of Troy BelcherCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-11-22
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 4,617×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 2,057×
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court· 1994-10-13· cited 831×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 407×
- State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court· 1996-09-19· cited 279×
- State v. LynnCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-08-31· cited 243×
- John Doe v. Puget Sound Blood CenterWashington Supreme Court· 1991-11-14· cited 141×
- Campbell v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1999-10-21· cited 81×
- In Re Detention of CampbellWashington Supreme Court· 1999-12-14· cited 68×
- In Re the Detention of BrooksCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-03-15· cited 24×
- In Re Detention of RossCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-08-18· cited 16×
- In re RossCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-08-18· cited 14×
- In Re Detention of GordonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-10-16· cited 12×
- State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-10-16· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.