Skip to main content

State v. Strauss

Citations

  • 106 Wash. App. 1
  • 20 P.3d 1022

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding admissibility of MnSost, RRASOR, and VRAG, actuarial instruments that demonstrate likelihood to reoffend; instruments generally accepted in relevant scientific community
  • affirming lower court’s denial of a Frye hearing on the VRAG in sexual dangerousness case because “the relevant scientific community generally accepts” the instrument
  • in which the Washington appellate court held that actuarial instruments were generally accepted within the relevant scientific community
  • the relevant scientific community generally accepts the MnSOST and the VRAG and, therefore, a Frye hearing is unnecessary
  • in which the Washington appellate court held that actuarial instruments were generally accepted within the relevant scientific community
  • expert testified that Strauss suffered from paraphilia, not otherwise specified, rape

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.