Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 833 So. 2d 243
  • 2002 WL 31870170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court should balance the defendant’s right to privacy with the State’s legitimate access to medical and psychological records of sexually violent predators
  • holding that the court should balance the defendant's right to privacy with the State's legitimate access to medical and psychological records of sexually violent predators
  • concluding that the trial court did not err by determining that the actuarial instruments used in that case were “generally accepted in the relevant scientific community as part of the overall risk assessment for sexual predators”
  • concluding that the trial court did not err by determining that the actuarial instruments used in that case were \generally accepted in the relevant scientific community as part of the overall risk assessment for sexual predators\
  • upholding the trial court's determination that the actuarial instruments \are generally accepted in the relevant scientific community as part of the overall risk assessment for sexual predators\
  • upholding the trial court's determination that the actuarial instruments \are generally accepted in the relevant scientific community as part of the overall risk assessment for sexual predators.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.