Idaho Supreme Court· 1/6/2005
State v. Stover
Citations
- 104 P.3d 969
- 140 Idaho 927
- 2005 Ida. LEXIS 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[t]he Blakely Court recognized that an indeterminate sen- fencing system does not violate the Sixth Amendment”
- stating that \[t]he Blakely Court recognized that an indeterminate sentencing system does not violate the Sixth Amendment\
- acknowledging that a statute is unambiguous, but still considering public policy behind the statute and legislative history
- emphasizing the discretionary nature of weighing mitigating and aggravating factors
- emphasizing the discretionary nature of weighing mitigating and aggravating factors
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burdick, Schroeder, Trout, Kidwell, Eismann
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Vensor v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2007-02-05· cited 292×
- State v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court· 2008-07-23· cited 133×
- State v. FarwellIdaho Supreme Court· 2007-10-22· cited 111×
- People v. DrohanMichigan Supreme Court· 2006-06-13· cited 90×
- State v. Daniel Ryan StraubIdaho Supreme Court· 2013-01-07· cited 76×
- State v. JonesIdaho Court of Appeals· 2005-05-27· cited 62×
- State v. WindomIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-03-16· cited 58×
- Rhoades v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-03-17· cited 41×
- State v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-11-18· cited 36×
- State v. FlowersIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-03-17· cited 34×
- State v. CopeIdaho Supreme Court· 2006-02-02· cited 33×
- Statewide Construction, Inc. v. PietriIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-02-07· cited 20×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2006-02-21· cited 19×
- State v. Raymond Stuart NienburgIdaho Court of Appeals· 2012-06-22· cited 11×
- State v. Charles Leo BakerIdaho Court of Appeals· 2012-12-10· cited 10×
- State v. McGiboneyIdaho Court of Appeals· 2012-04-18· cited 9×
- State v. PeregrinaIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-09-07· cited 8×
- State v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court· 2023-06-07· cited 7×
- State v. Kevin Christian OverlineIdaho Court of Appeals· 2012-12-03· cited 5×
- State v. SalazarIdaho Court of Appeals· 2012-02-13· cited 5×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court· 1948-06-14· cited 1,667×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 1,506×
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 664×
- United States v. Freddie J. BookerSeventh Circuit· 2004-07-09· cited 344×
- State v. YagerIdaho Supreme Court· 2004-02-11· cited 96×
- State v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court· 2003-05-01· cited 85×
- State v. McCoyIdaho Supreme Court· 1971-06-25· cited 76×
- State v. CrossIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-04-29· cited 53×
- Peltier v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-02-27· cited 38×
- United States v. Monroe Clinton MaplesFourth Circuit· 1974-08-07· cited 26×
- State v. LewisIdaho Supreme Court· 1993-02-25· cited 25×
- BHA Investments, Inc. v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2003-01-30· cited 19×
- State v. BransonIdaho Supreme Court· 1996-06-07· cited 19×
- Adamson v. BlanchardIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-12-09· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.