State v. Daniel Ryan Straub

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “restitution, while attendant to a criminal conviction and 2 most often adjudicated at the sentencing hearing, is not part of a defendant’s ‘sentence’”
• holding that “actual out-of-pocket medical expenses and lost wages up to the date of sentencing may be included in a restitution order”
• holding that “actual out-of-pocket medical expenses and lost wages up to the date of sentencing may be included in a restitution order”
• “The constitutional right of trial by jury has been interpreted by this Court to secure that right as it existed at common law when the Idaho Constitution was adopted.”
• “The constitutional right of trial by jury has been interpreted by this Court to secure that right as it existed at common law when the Idaho Constitution was adopted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).