Parma v. Perotti
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1359
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B) application for reopening consecutive sentences allied offenses bifurcation joinder of offenses. The appellant's App.R. 26(B) application for reopening is denied because appellate counsel was not ineffective on appeal. Proposed assignments of error that dealt with the imposition of consecutive sentences, allied offenses, and joinder of offenses for trial are without merit. The appellant was not prejudiced by the failure of appellate counsel to raise the three proposed assignment of error on appeal.
Judges: E.A. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-20· cited 1,623×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1984-11-07· cited 1,321×
- State v. HannaOhio Supreme Court· 2002-05-22· cited 176×
- State v. RicksOhio Supreme Court· 2013-09-05· cited 102×
- State v. RichcreekOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-16· cited 53×
- State v. ErkerOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-08· cited 19×
- State v. MayOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-28· cited 18×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-25· cited 9×
- State v. StevensOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-21· cited 9×
- Broadview Hts. v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-21· cited 4×
- Parma v. PerottiOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-28· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.